top of page

Artjunkie reports the latest on the Dolce and Gabbana Trademark opposition case against D&G Auto

Artjunkie has just been informed that intalian Fashion house Dolce and Gabbana has lost the trademark opposition case against D&G Auto. Artjunkie congrats the small company on not backing down and taking on the fashion house the full report below

12:38 Friday 16 March 2012

PSTYLE=wint_web intro

ONE is a small firm in Fife targeting a modest expansion across the central belt of Scotland, the other is a global fashion powerhouse worth hundreds of millions of pounds.

But after a David and Goliath legal battle, a Dunfermline-based mechanics company is celebrating victory over fashion powerhouse, Dolce & Gabba

The bizarre dispute centred around the use of the initials, D&G, as made famous by the internationally renowned Italian brand.

D&G Autocare, which has nine branches around Fife, Perth, Stirling and Livingston, tried to have the name registered as a trademark in order to prevent rival mechanics from cashing in on its success.

The garage owners, David Hunter and George Simpson, had no reason to believe their application to the UK Intellectual Property Office would be refused.

But they were shocked to discover Dolce & Gabbana lodged a “notice of threatened opposition” to their trademark in December. The company’s trademark agents claimed that the application conflicted with their own trademark, and would lead to confusion among consumers.

In correspondence sent to the small Dunfermline business, which employs 45 workers, the agents urged the garage owners to withdraw their application.

“We had invested in our business, in our people and expanded based on a strong policy of customer care,” explained Mr Simpson, 42.

It was a very strongly worded letter and I think it would have scared a lot of people off, But it left a very sour taste in our mouths and we decided to fight their objection.”

The garage enlisted the services of Dunfermline-based solicitor Neil Killick from Young & Partners.

Mr Killick explained: “The way trademarks work is that there are several trademark classes, which is why Polo is a registered trademark for Volkswagen in relation to the car and Nestlé in relation to the mint.

“Dolce & Gabbana had registered the D&G name across all the different trademark classes, including class 12 which covers vehicles and vehicle parts. We asked for proof of the use of their trademark in this class, which we knew would be impossible for them to do.”

The Italian firm came back with a deal, stating that it would not formally oppose the trademark application so long as the Fife company always used the word Autocare with its D&G logo, and did not try to register the firm outside Britain.

Now, D&G Autocare has been officially granted its trademark, and Mr Simpson praised the way Mr Killick fought their corner.

He added: “Now we couldn’t be happier. At the eleventh hour they came back to negotiate with us. They were okay with it as long as we didn’t go into Europe.”

“Our solicitors stood firm. They argued that we as a small garage company and Dolce and Gabbana in the fashion industry are in completely different fields.” Dolce & Gabbana declined to comment.


Featured Posts
Check back soon
Once posts are published, you’ll see them here.
Recent Posts
Search By Tags
Follow Us
  • Facebook Basic Square
  • Twitter Basic Square
  • Google+ Basic Square
bottom of page